Relative abandonment and its impact on the authentication of the Imams Discrediting and Endorsement

Abstract

The research aims to differentiate between the well-known idiomatic abandonment of the imams of the term, by which they mean abandoning the hadith of the narrator accused of lying, and the relative abandonment in which some of the narrators who some imams of critics left their narrations for reasons that may go beyond the accusation of lying .
My intention in the research was the relative abandonment that is not limited to accusing the narrator or unanimously accusing him. Rather, some imams may accuse him, and he is abandoned by them without others, for reasons related to justice and others related to accuracy .
As for what is related to the fairness of the narrator, it includes abandoning the narration from him because of heresy and insulting his peers, and so on .
I mentioned examples of some of the narrators whom some of the imams stated that their hadith should be abandoned, along with mentioning the sayings of Imams Discrediting and Endorsement in each of their narrators, whether they were endorsement or discrediting Then he mentioned the summary of the most correct saying in that narrator that the judgment on the narrator being totally or relatively abandoned is not reached except after the complete extrapolation of the sayings of the imams critics from the moderated and wounded, and then judging the narrator after that with what suits him, relying in all of that on the sayings of the imams of art, may Allah be merciful to them.