The position of Ibn Rushd the grandson (d: 595 AH) regarding the totality And its impact on the different interpreters

Abstract

The aim of the research is to shed light on the position of Ibn Rushd the grandson (d.: 595 AH) regarding the totality and its impact on the difference of commentators, by following the inductive and analytical approaches. On the other in relation to him, and it is contained in the Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet, and it does not disappear except with a statement from the street, while the problem arising from it disappears with the presence of evidence, and due to that, the summation raised a difference between the interpreters, so there were many sayings in the sum of the Qur’an and the Sunnah. This is the difference that also arose among the scholars of the principles of jurisprudence. And that Ibn Rushd, the grandson, said in general, and he said that it occurred in the Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet, and in his view the general is not considered a legal evidence until its totality is removed by the statement, and its statement is only with the presence of a presumption or a legal evidence that explains it; As Ibn Rushd said in general about actions, and that the actions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) indicate the entirety of the Holy Qur’an, and the entirety of his words (peace be upon him) and his actions.